From a Western perspective, China’s economic situation seems to be dominated by the looming trade war with the U.S. However, structural reforms and the long-term transformation of China’s economy and financial system are accelerating as well. Almost four decades after China’s real economy was reformed and liberalized, China’s financial economy is also opening up to the world.
Early this year, China’s central bank said that it would maintain a prudent monetary policy, meaning further financial reforms and liberalization, curbing credit and TSF growth (i.e. monetary tightening) to contain financial risks in order to make the financial sector “serve the real economy”. But 2018 seems to be becoming a tumultuous year for China’s economy, with a Sino-American trade war looming. However, other structural and longer-term reforms are accelerating, increasingly transforming China’s financial system.First, China’s shrinking current account and trade surpluses arguably imply that China’s economy is modernizing, because it’s becoming less dependent on exports. This is reflected by the fact that its share of global exports seems to have peaked, but that imports growth has accelerated as a result of stronger aggregate domestic demand. Furthermore, a current account deficit is basically the difference between a country’s investments and savings. In China, we see that investments as a share of China’s GDP have decreased in recent years since its peak in 2013, thus China’s savings rate must have decreased as well, giving a further boost to domestic consumption. And indeed, China’s most recent GDP data show that consumption now accounts for almost 78% of all growth while the growth of industrial production and fixed capital investments is decelerating. As China continues to run larger deficits, it will be forced to either deplete its FX reserves or borrow money on international capital markets.That pertains to the second process, namely China’s efforts to internationalize the yuan. We have written before that China’s long-term currency strategy is to increase the yuan’s share in international transactions, in which China’s currency is still significantly underrepresented (barely 1.5% of international transactions includes the yuan) given its economic size (almost a fifth of global GDP). By making the yuan more ubiquitous in international payment traffic and capital markets, China can reduce its dependency on the U.S. by becoming less reliant on the U.S. dollar and escaping the jurisdictional reach of the U.S. Treasury (America’s financial payment systems regulate most international transactions). Furthermore, by boosting the yuan as global reserve currency, China can lure other economies into its financial sphere (e.g. countries along the BRI). This will further reinforce China’s position in global trade and affairs.Given the risks that are associated with these transitions and the looming trade war, these ambitions might put an extra strain on China’s deleveraging process. But Chinese regulators have committed to further reforming and opening up the country’s financial sector. From this perspective, the PBoC’s recent monetary policy moves can be considered structural attempts to eliminate its culture of moral hazard, on the assumption that the Chinese state will bail out large companies, instead of opting for monetary easing. For example, the recent RRR cut aims to free up resources for China’s SMEs, while putting further pressure on commercial banks to clean up bad debt, which is mainly concentrated in larger SOEs. As the PBoC has a dual mandate, like the Fed, it must maintain price stability and facilitate economic growth. But it can explicitly do so by maintaining a stable currency. From this perspective, the recent devaluation of the yuan against the U.S. dollar has been framed as a new phase in the U.S.-China trade war. But given that the gains (i.e. making China’s exports cheaper) will be outweighed by the negative consequences (e.g. capital outflows, further liquidity and credit tightening) and considering China’s ambition to internationalize the yuan, this move is more the result of China’s financial system becoming more resilient and based on market valuations (China’s currency has long been considered overvalued).